How to Effectively Measure Broadband Speeds?

There will always be claims of product/service superiority among competing companies and the one between Smart and Globe is a classic example. The latest one is the battle between mobile broadband services Globe Tattoo and Smart Bro.

I’m sure a lot of you have seen SmartBro’s latest commercial with Mo Twister in it. If you haven’t, check this YouTube clip:

In the commercial, Smart claims that 9 out of 10 times, SmartBro is faster than the competing brand. In this case it, was implying Globe Tattoo (the blurred footage of the Tattoo USB dongle is pretty obvious). In the trials made by Smart they used Speedtest.net as their benchmark tool of choice.

Not to be outdone, Globe Telecom wants to rebut the claim and says it isn’t so. So Globe commissioned NESIC to do a broadband test for them and showed the results to the media proving otherwise.

The methodology includes both an HTPP Speed Test using 2Wire.com as well as Direct HTTP Download from Download.com and an FTP Speed Test using a 12MB file from a local server. I am sure you know what the results of the study are and who came on top.

What is more interesting is the methodology of the benchmarking they’ve done. In my opinion, using SpeedTest.net is not a reliable way to test broadband speeds, despite it being a popular tool among users. My understanding is that Speedtest.net measures the burst speed of your connection and not the sustained speed or average speed. It means that during the test window, the tool will see variable speeds (that’s while the dial meter fluctuates) and will pick up the fastest it has detected. In some sense, it is a good way to measure the maximum achievable speed of an internet connection but that’s all it does.

Here’s an analogy — imagine a Javelin Thrower in a competition is allowed 3 attempts to get the javelin the farthest. His 3 attempts were 55 feet, 125 feet and 185 feet. If SpeedTest.net were the judge, it will score the athlete a 185 feet rating. If 2Wire.com were the judge, it will give the athlete just 121.67 feet (average of 3 attempts).

So why is Globe saying that Speedtest.net is not reliable? Because it does not take into account consistency. Let’s go back to the Javelin tournament — a second athlete throws with the following distances: 145 feet, 130 feet, 155 feet. If Speedtest.net were the judge, it will give the 2nd athlete a score of 155 feet while 2Wire.com would give it 143.3 feet.

Now, which of the two athletes is the better javelin thrower?

However, there could be a number of external factors that may affect speed test for mobile broadband:

  • Location of the Test Site. The distance of the cell tower from the test site can affect the performance of the benchmark as signal degrades over distance.
  • Signal Strength. This is self-explanatory. Factors include distance, elevation and barriers like buildings or thick walls.
  • Connection Mode. Connection mode (GPRS, EDGE, 3G, HSDPA) sometimes switches depending on which tower is servicing the connection.
  • Time of the Day. Networks could get congested depending on the time of the day when a lot of users are using the network.

Rather than using benchmark tools, I’d rather propose some real-world measurements:

  • Download a movie file using Bittorent. A 600MB file downloaded in about 4 hours will give you a speed of 44KB/s or 350Kbps. Longer download times will give us a better picture of the network’s consistency.
  • Streaming with YouTube HD. Streaming a 10-minute HD video on YouTube will also provide live bandwidth performance of the connection. This can be augmented with a YouTube upload of a 100MB file to see upstream speeds.
  • iTunes Download. What I used to do is download 3 video podcasts simultaneously on iTunes and record the incoming bandwidth using NetMeter. This will show sustained download speeds (like the one shown below).

Who has the biggest subscriber base? Who has the widest coverage? Who has the fastest mobile broadband service? Any one of them can claim these but ultimately it is the users’ commulative experience that will decide which is more reliable.

Abe Olandres
Abe Olandres
Abe is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of YugaTech with over 20 years of experience in the technology industry. He is one of the pioneers of blogging in the country and considered by many as the Father of Tech Blogging in the Philippines. He is also a technology consultant, a tech columnist with several national publications, resource speaker and mentor/advisor to several start-up companies.
  1. Good post. Hopes this gets the link love it deserves.

    Providers, take notice.

  2. I agree… I used speedtest.net last few days measuring the if the upgrade on my PLDT DSL subscription is working…

    Seems like I have to test it again using other methods to get the real speed.

  3. Another point that should be added when looking at broadband speed tests is coverage. Which network has better coverage AND network throughput overall?

    They can run speed tests all they want but what matters to everyone are:
    1.) Can they avail of the service (meaning connect to the network) with the same consistency that they’re touting?
    2.) Can the infrastructure handle all those connections? Or will we get to point 3..
    3.) Are we getting throttled? -> Probably going to raise red flags to the most active users :D

  4. I had a friend who got an apartment unit somewhere in JP Rizal (Makati City). He’s currently using Globe Tattoo. He’s always upset because even if the UI of Globe Tattoo indicates my friend has HSDPA as the device’s signal, he’s experiencing a really SLOW connection. I tried to explain to him that internet speed is different from internet bandwidth. His Tattoo may show him the datacard is receiving a very strong signal but the question is the bandwidth available in his location (network congestion). And he’s been arguing with me about this analogy the whole night. Hahaha. Was I right or not? I hope somebody will clear this out for us. If I’m right, I’ll be very excited to show this thread to my friend. If not, oh well, I’ll admit to him that I’m wrong. :p

  5. If it’s about their mobile internet speed, three words: location, location, location.

    3G signal is strong in malls and cities, while very spotty in the provinces for both networks. So the commercial by Smart? It’s just another PR stunt.

  6. People who get suckered by that ad will be in for a really big disappointment. Smart should be ashamed of themselves. The only time I can consider Smart Bro usable is during 2am – 7 am in the morning. Sheesh!

  7. have any one tried the crack USB modem, im using it now, if the area have strong smart signal, I use smart sim vice versa for globe . . . . . sorry for my english

  8. After missing cellphone credits, this is another techy thing that the Congress should investigate. They should clarify what “speed up to…” is all about. There should be a minimum speed that subscribers should have in any given package.

    Abe, suggestion though. Please disclose in this post any business linkage you have with Globe, Smart, or Sun.

  9. I’ve been using a Smart Bro canopy for over a year and i can the speeds have been consistent especially for torrent downloads and video streams.

    USB users will always have a different opinion since they are mobile and certainly the experience will depend on their location and the density of subscribers.

    Globe on the other hand..well I’ve used their USB modems before they were tattoed and they flat out SUCKED. Multiple areas, nada. Sorry I couldn’t have said more gently.

  10. The more subscribers, the more that are using the networks respectively, the slower the connection. Of course these telcos want to maximize their earnings by overcrowding their subscribers….. bahala na si batman basta may kita tayo. Don’t be fooled by their commercials, pare pareho lang sila. Typical inefficient utility providers

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

yugatech x epson

Latest Review

Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Review
vivo V50 5G Review
OPPO Find N5 Review
realme 14 Pro+ 5G Review
ASUS ROG Flow Z13 2025 Review

Latest Guide

A Look Inside Grab’s IoT Innovations at Grab HQ After GrabX2025
Top 10 AFFORDABLE 65-inch 4K TVs To Buy In The Philippines (Q1 2025)
BEV, Hybrid, PHEV: An Explainer for the Common Filipino Driver
2025 Postpaid Fiber Plans in the Philippines: PLDT, Globe, Converge, Sky
Top Apple products to kickstart the New Year through Home Credit

YugaAuto

Connection issue detected. Retrying in 2 seconds... (1/3)

YugaMoto

Connection issue detected. Retrying in 4 seconds... (2/3)

YugaGaming

Connection issue detected. Retrying in 8 seconds... (3/3)

AskYuga

This feed may not be accessible from your current location due to regional restrictions. You may need to use a VPN or contact the site administrator for assistance.
How to Effectively Measure Broadband Speeds? » YugaTech | Philippines Tech News & Reviews

Yearly Device Database

Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2024

Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2023

Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2022

Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2021

Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2020

Popular Topics

What We Do

YugaTech | Philippines Tech News & Reviews
© 2024. All Rights Reserved.