There will always be claims of product/service superiority among competing companies and the one between Smart and Globe is a classic example. The latest one is the battle between mobile broadband services Globe Tattoo and Smart Bro.
I’m sure a lot of you have seen SmartBro’s latest commercial with Mo Twister in it. If you haven’t, check this YouTube clip:
In the commercial, Smart claims that 9 out of 10 times, SmartBro is faster than the competing brand. In this case it, was implying Globe Tattoo (the blurred footage of the Tattoo USB dongle is pretty obvious). In the trials made by Smart they used Speedtest.net as their benchmark tool of choice.
Not to be outdone, Globe Telecom wants to rebut the claim and says it isn’t so. So Globe commissioned NESIC to do a broadband test for them and showed the results to the media proving otherwise.
The methodology includes both an HTPP Speed Test using 2Wire.com as well as Direct HTTP Download from Download.com and an FTP Speed Test using a 12MB file from a local server. I am sure you know what the results of the study are and who came on top.
What is more interesting is the methodology of the benchmarking they’ve done. In my opinion, using SpeedTest.net is not a reliable way to test broadband speeds, despite it being a popular tool among users. My understanding is that Speedtest.net measures the burst speed of your connection and not the sustained speed or average speed. It means that during the test window, the tool will see variable speeds (that’s while the dial meter fluctuates) and will pick up the fastest it has detected. In some sense, it is a good way to measure the maximum achievable speed of an internet connection but that’s all it does.
Here’s an analogy — imagine a Javelin Thrower in a competition is allowed 3 attempts to get the javelin the farthest. His 3 attempts were 55 feet, 125 feet and 185 feet. If SpeedTest.net were the judge, it will score the athlete a 185 feet rating. If 2Wire.com were the judge, it will give the athlete just 121.67 feet (average of 3 attempts).
So why is Globe saying that Speedtest.net is not reliable? Because it does not take into account consistency. Let’s go back to the Javelin tournament — a second athlete throws with the following distances: 145 feet, 130 feet, 155 feet. If Speedtest.net were the judge, it will give the 2nd athlete a score of 155 feet while 2Wire.com would give it 143.3 feet.
Now, which of the two athletes is the better javelin thrower?
However, there could be a number of external factors that may affect speed test for mobile broadband:
Rather than using benchmark tools, I’d rather propose some real-world measurements:
Who has the biggest subscriber base? Who has the widest coverage? Who has the fastest mobile broadband service? Any one of them can claim these but ultimately it is the users’ commulative experience that will decide which is more reliable.
YugaTech.com is the largest and longest-running technology site in the Philippines. Originally established in October 2002, the site was transformed into a full-fledged technology platform in 2005.
How to transfer, withdraw money from PayPal to GCash
Prices of Starlink satellite in the Philippines
Install Google GBox to Huawei smartphones
Pag-IBIG MP2 online application
How to check PhilHealth contributions online
How to find your SIM card serial number
Globe, PLDT, Converge, Sky: Unli fiber internet plans compared
10 biggest games in the Google Play Store
LTO periodic medical exam for 10-year licenses
Netflix codes to unlock hidden TV shows, movies
Apple, Asus, Cherry Mobile, Huawei, LG, Nokia, Oppo, Samsung, Sony, Vivo, Xiaomi, Lenovo, Infinix Mobile, Pocophone, Honor, iPhone, OnePlus, Tecno, Realme, HTC, Gionee, Kata, IQ00, Redmi, Razer, CloudFone, Motorola, Panasonic, TCL, Wiko
Best Android smartphones between PHP 20,000 - 25,000
Smartphones under PHP 10,000 in the Philippines
Smartphones under PHP 12K Philippines
Best smartphones for kids under PHP 7,000
Smartphones under PHP 15,000 in the Philippines
Best Android smartphones between PHP 15,000 - 20,000
Smartphones under PHP 20,000 in the Philippines
Most affordable 5G phones in the Philippines under PHP 20K
5G smartphones in the Philippines under PHP 16K
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2024
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2023
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2022
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2021
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2020
Brian_B says:
Good post. Hopes this gets the link love it deserves.
Providers, take notice.
marvin says:
I agree… I used speedtest.net last few days measuring the if the upgrade on my PLDT DSL subscription is working…
Seems like I have to test it again using other methods to get the real speed.
lolipown says:
Another point that should be added when looking at broadband speed tests is coverage. Which network has better coverage AND network throughput overall?
They can run speed tests all they want but what matters to everyone are:
1.) Can they avail of the service (meaning connect to the network) with the same consistency that they’re touting?
2.) Can the infrastructure handle all those connections? Or will we get to point 3..
3.) Are we getting throttled? -> Probably going to raise red flags to the most active users :D
Paul Pisig says:
I had a friend who got an apartment unit somewhere in JP Rizal (Makati City). He’s currently using Globe Tattoo. He’s always upset because even if the UI of Globe Tattoo indicates my friend has HSDPA as the device’s signal, he’s experiencing a really SLOW connection. I tried to explain to him that internet speed is different from internet bandwidth. His Tattoo may show him the datacard is receiving a very strong signal but the question is the bandwidth available in his location (network congestion). And he’s been arguing with me about this analogy the whole night. Hahaha. Was I right or not? I hope somebody will clear this out for us. If I’m right, I’ll be very excited to show this thread to my friend. If not, oh well, I’ll admit to him that I’m wrong. :p
Jhay says:
If it’s about their mobile internet speed, three words: location, location, location.
3G signal is strong in malls and cities, while very spotty in the provinces for both networks. So the commercial by Smart? It’s just another PR stunt.
Ric says:
People who get suckered by that ad will be in for a really big disappointment. Smart should be ashamed of themselves. The only time I can consider Smart Bro usable is during 2am – 7 am in the morning. Sheesh!
ROEL_V says:
have any one tried the crack USB modem, im using it now, if the area have strong smart signal, I use smart sim vice versa for globe . . . . . sorry for my english
herbert says:
After missing cellphone credits, this is another techy thing that the Congress should investigate. They should clarify what “speed up to…” is all about. There should be a minimum speed that subscribers should have in any given package.
Abe, suggestion though. Please disclose in this post any business linkage you have with Globe, Smart, or Sun.
berkano says:
I’ve been using a Smart Bro canopy for over a year and i can the speeds have been consistent especially for torrent downloads and video streams.
USB users will always have a different opinion since they are mobile and certainly the experience will depend on their location and the density of subscribers.
Globe on the other hand..well I’ve used their USB modems before they were tattoed and they flat out SUCKED. Multiple areas, nada. Sorry I couldn’t have said more gently.
francis says:
The more subscribers, the more that are using the networks respectively, the slower the connection. Of course these telcos want to maximize their earnings by overcrowding their subscribers….. bahala na si batman basta may kita tayo. Don’t be fooled by their commercials, pare pareho lang sila. Typical inefficient utility providers