The Kirin 970 was flexing its muscle against the Exynos 8895 so we also tested how it fares against Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 835.
For this test, we used the Huawei Mate 10 Pro running on Kirin 970 and the Xiaomi Mi 6 running on the Snapdragon 835. The Mate 10 Pro has a full HD+ resolution while the Mi 6 also has an almost similar full HD resolution. Both devices come with 6GB of RAM.
Here are the results of the test.
| HiSilicon Kirin 970 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 | |
|---|---|---|
| High-Power Processor | 4 x ARM Cortex A73 2.36GHz | 4 x Kryo 280 2.45GHz |
| Low-power Processor | 4 x ARM Cortex A53 1.69GHz | 4 x Kryo 280 1.9GHz |
| GPU | Mali G72 MP12 | Adreno 540 |
| Antutu Benchmark | 174,579 | 171,789 |
| GeekBench 4 Single-Core | 1,899 | 1,938 |
| GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 6,734 | 6,720 |
| PCMark Work 2.0 | 6,987 | 6,901 |
| 3DMark | 2,929 | 3,195 |
Surprisingly, the Kirin 970 and Snapdragon 835 are statistically tied in a lot of the CPU-crunching tests — from Antutu, GeekBench and PCMark Work 2.0.
The only time where the Snapdragon 835 had a significant lead over the Kirin 970 is in the graphics department as shown by the 3DMark scores. The Adreno 540 bested the Mali G72 MP12 by 10% in this test.
Over-all though, we can say that the Kirin 970 has very similar performance as the Snapdragon 835. This is a huge improvement from the Kirin 960 where it trailed behind all other mobile chips.
Related: Kirin 970 vs. Exynos 8895
el gato says:
i cannot afford any device powered by either high-end SOCs so my only priority is long battery life in actual real-life usage… budget smartphone lang po…
ano kaya budget SOCs ng huawei, samsung, at qualcomm?
tae says:
Snapdragon chipsets that start with 4 (430, 435) are for budget/entry level.
tae says:
Snapdragon all the way