Call to Action: How we can push for faster PH internet

Here’s an article I read a couple of years ago:

“Hi all, I’m a foreigner living in Manila that has spent the last 15 years building large scale networks in Europe, with a heavy focus on northern Europe. I apologize in advance that I do not speak Tagalog (yet) so I’m only able to write this in English.

I’ve read a lot of posts here on the forums, and although they are mostly well meant, most are factually wrong. I contribute this to lack of knowledge in terms of carrier grade networking so it’s completely understandable so let’s start by defining what lag (latency) is. Also this is focused at our specific situation – playing LoL in Philippines.

For a game such as LoL you have 4 layers of possible latency:

1) Consumer end (PC/Router/Bandwidth)
2) ISP
3) Interconnect/Transit
4) Server end (Servers, load balancers etc.)

To measure latency end-to-end ICMP echo (PING) packets are not a reliable tool. There are many reasons for this but for us the main reason is that ICMP is a down prioritized packet type. Historically the ping tool was meant to see if a host was alive, not to measure connectivity – the reason it does have response times were to identify possible routing errors or DNS IP mixups. Remember this tool is older than most people playing LoL.

On Windows ‘tracert’ uses ICMP echo requests to probe the route of the connection to your destination. If you do want to trace the route using ICMP echo I can recommend WinMTR as a replacement for tracert that is a lot faster and more accurate. WinMTR can be found here. The UNIX version has an option to do UDP based packets which is more relevant for us as UDP is usually used in online gaming because of reduced latency and overhead as compared to TCP.

In Europe the infrastructure and government laws are usually very good and the laws enforced. This means that the most common causes of latency is on the consumer end. People mostly have ADSL connections and forget they have something running in the background (seeding is the main culprit in most cases) as with ADSL when you saturate your uplink you obliterate your downlink. But here in Philippines there are a lot of other causes for latency for us gamers – the worst being PLDT – yes you read that right, PLDT is intentionally disrupting online gaming in the Philippines. I will explain in greater detail below.

PLDT (and SMART) are actively fighting interconnect laws here in the Philippines. This is done mostly because of the mobile market but internet (and thus gaming) suffers as a result. Because SMART (and with the purchase of Sun) has the dominant market share, they are not interested in interconnecting with other Telcos, but specifically they do not want Globe subscribers to be satisfied with Globe so they will switch to SMART – this is why they are limiting the interconnect between PLDT and Globe, they are essentially throttling the data exchange between the companies. This is against the law here in Philippines but as with a lot of other things here, money talks – morale walks. I assume you’ve experienced long delays on texting between Globe/SMART?

Here is a recent article on the problem(http://manilastandardtoday.com/2013/02/22/globes-interconnection-woes/).

Keep in mind that that interconnection is standard in other markets and I’ve never come across any other Telco being as manipulative towards their customers as PLDT/SMART.

So what does SMS delays have to do with LoL latency you ask? Well the biggest problem here is that by default PLDT routes all domestic traffic via an IX in HK. This means if you send data between a PLDT DSL subscriber and any other major ISP here it goes via a Hong Kong Internet eXchange. There is a law passed in Philippines that all ISPs have to interconnect freely via an Internet eXchange so data can flow freely between the customers of the ISPs. Mind you this does not mean that a Globe/Sky/Bayan/Eastern customer can access data/servers outside PLDTs network, through PLDTs network – this is entirely between customers of the ISPs. This is common practice all over the world, even in dictatorships – except in Philippines.

ISPs buy transit traffic through backbone providers like PACNET, Level3, UUNet etc. – these are the services that connect your ISP to the world, it’s too expensive for all ISPs to run their own international backbone fibers.

Because of PLDTs enormous power they have been able to defy the laws of interconnection and because of this keep prices up and bandwidth down as a whole in Philippines. I’m not saying that the other Telcos here are angels but at least their obey the law of interconnection. Doesn’t it seem odd that Philippines is so far behind in terms of bandwidth/price for internet? It’s literally 10 year behind Europe in it’s current state.

It’s worth noting that Globe has a stake in the worlds most powerful sea fiber. This is why PLDT is scared that if they loose their stranglehold on the consumers here that they will realize that the competitor offers a superior product. Unfortunately Globe has some of the least educated support staff/customer service in Philippines so it’s not all roses on the ‘other side’.

I can give you a concrete example of how full PLDT is of themselves – I was involved in a project in Philippines (which is when I fell in love with the country and moved here afterwards) that also involved PACNET. I was dumbfounded why the routing in Philippines was all over the place, I was trying to understand whom or what was the cause of this terrible infrastructure so I could fix it, eventually I narrowed it down to PLDT being incompetent. As I met with the senior technicians from PACNET regarding a multi-gigabit transit setup here in Manila I asked them why PLDTs routing was all over the place, as they are the major operator it was important for us to have good connectivity with PLDT. The PACNET technician and the senior sales manager explained to me that of all the countries they do business in, Philippines was the only place where a Telco willing and carelessly broke conventional international norms. PACNET had been dumbfounded when PLDT asked PACNET to pay PLDT when PLDT wanted to buy backbone capacity from PACNET. Their reasoning was that without PLDT you could not service the general public in Philippines properly so that’s why PLDT should get money for allowing their customers direct access to PACNET. I’ll let that sink in a little.

PACNET is a company who’s main business is SELLING backbone capacity across South East Asia and PLDT wanted PACNET to pay so PLDT could get backbone capacity from PACNET. It is so stupid that it completely blows my mind.

Everything else they explain perfectly matched what I had seen examining the Philippines’ internet infrastructure. Unfortunately to remedy this situation you need non-corrupt representatives that also understands technology or the need for improving the infrastructure as a whole in Philippines – not being able to vote here was a relief as I doubt there are any.

To summarize:

Garena needs to supply us with an IP where we can do UDP based pings to have reliable connectivity diagnostics.

If Garena is relying solely on the standard connectivity at VITRO (ePLDT), then they need to invest in their own connectivity to Globe and Bayan/Sky.

The Filipino government needs to create a unified IX, that mandates you have to interconnect a certain bandwidth pr. subscriber with a minimum bandwidth of 1 Gigabit. Make it so that you loose the right to do Telco services if you are not connected to the public IX. (this would solve all connectivity issues for someone like Garena at zero cost to Garena and all other companies doing online services in Philippines).”

Additional info here in 2 posts: http://forum.lol.garena.ph/showthrea…l=1#post842031

credits to mikl0s of LoL PHL forums

Block torrents. Or at least block torrents on peak hours. Naiinis ako sa iba na magdamag nag dodownload sa torrent kahit tanghaling tapat, hindi nila alam apektado ang iba.

Good job Bob for this article.

This is one of the more complex issues in our country, evidently, yung struggle among politics, economy and social welfare.

Obviously, we know na naman na namomo-nopolize ang provision sa consumers and i do believe na the fastest solution would be an introduction of a competitive competition. I havent read the 60/40 thing mentioned above, but i do understand that it hinders foreign investments. Thus, we may need to dwell on it. Maybe hindi naman para i-abolish but to make it more enticing.

And of course, there is no one all-in solution.

But of course, kasama sa dapat solution is babaan ng current telcos ang subscription costs. They are earning billions. Ganid masyado.

The 60-40 issue is a long ways off from being resolved since it involves alot of industries… And even then, I think it wont solve our expensive internet since business is business. I think part of the issue is due to our government agencies not having enough police/enforcement powers. Remember the DTI memorandum saying cash prices must equal credit card prices? Nothing happened. Because even if a store violated that memorandum in front of the DTI office itself, the DTI can’t do anything about it. They can’t sue the store. Same with the NTC.. Notice all the NTC does is have these ridiculous hearings and nothing comes out of it. Parang Senate hearings lang, walang napupuntahan.

While I agree with abolishing the 60/40 ownership rule of business between local and foreign entities, the internet connection issue in the Philippines is actually just a symptom of the real problem of businesses in the Philippines. TOO MUCH GOVERNMENT, TOO LITTLE FREE-MARKET.

No. We can’t ask these companies to sacrifice profit. It’s like asking they’re employees to also agree to a pay cut or to freeze hiring or to reduce their workforce altogether.

We can, however, support Sen. Sonny Angara’s Senate Bill 2149 to cap the income tax rate to 25% across the board and Sen. Recto’s bill to return VAT to 10% for starters. This will enable people to keep more of their money and increase the number of those able to afford internet connection. In the business side, less operating cost that opens doors to upgrading equipment and hiring more competent engineers.

Secondly, the government needs to welcome more entities (foreign or local) to invest or to enter our energy market thereby reducing costs in power generation through competition and improved techniques in generation. Heck! Let’s start talks again to open the country to nuclear power.

What is internet except the application of electric power towards exchange of information? I know it’s an oversimplified explanation but who can say that there is no industry more solely dependent on energy than the telecomms industry?

In these solutions, we let Free-Market forces solve our problems and the government only has to step back, take less and take out a few regulations. Plus it also benefits more industries than telecommunications.

At a time, these solutions may cost more at the start but it also promises businesses of better profits in the long term. In the end, everybody wins.

Best advice would be having Nuclear Power here in the Philippines.

agree ako sa alhat ng suggestions sa article maliban sa isa,ung pagabolish ng 60/40 rule.alm naman natin na pag inabolish to hindi lng naman ung internet industry ang maaapektuhan,pati ung walang kinalaman sa internet eh maaapektuhan din,maaapektuhan ung mga local players.hindi ako expert pagdating dito,pero sa tingin ko pwede naman ienforce ung 60/40 rule maliban sa ilang industry na nagkakaroon ng monopoly tulad ng sa internet industry satin.kumbaga ieexempt ung mga industries na nangangailangan ng mas malaking competition para bumaba ung presyo ng serbisyo.

Why our internet sucks big time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ilMx7k7mso