The recent controversy over the recent CES has gotten everyone hyped up. One Gizmodo editor pulled a prank by turning off a few TVs with a remote and eventually got banned from future conferences.
The debate shifted from being a funny prank to a word-fight between bloggers and legitimate media people. The video was funny the first few seconds.
This prank stirs big debate among bloggers as well as mainstream media to the point that it has turned into bloggers versus journalist (again!). Brian Lam, Editor in Chief of Gizmodo, finished it off with a recent lash against their critics:
Many of our harshest critics have done far worse than clicking off a few TVs. I’m talking about ethical lapses such as accepting paid junkets to Japan by Nikon, or free trips to Korea by Samsung. Turning a blind eye to Apple’s mistakes when they didn’t make an iPhone SDK and sought to lock down the handset. Stock prices torn downward by publishing incorrect leaked info. Writing about companies that also pay you for advertorial podcast work.
And I consider those offenses far worse than our prank, because it ultimately it puts the perpetrators on the wrong team. Every tech journalist has to decide whether or not he’s writing for companies or for readers. When they start writing for the companies, covering all their press releases and regurgitating marketing jargon, you do no one any favors (not even the companies, which already hire press release machines).
Brian makes a valid argument, but I think that’s beside the point. I don’t think he and his team planned out the prank to pay homage to the notion of independence and independent reporting. He’s just officially escalated the debate from a simple question of ethics when pulling a prank to issues of personal credibility, journalistic integrity and independence.
Does Giz deserve their punishment? Rightfully so. If they thought the CES was boring, why cover it? Try pulling the same stunt at MacWorld.
Is Brian Lam justified to pull the “He who hath not sinned cast the first stone” card? I think he’s got balls. But he’s also throwing the same stones back at him and his team.
YugaTech.com is the largest and longest-running technology site in the Philippines. Originally established in October 2002, the site was transformed into a full-fledged technology platform in 2005.
How to transfer, withdraw money from PayPal to GCash
Prices of Starlink satellite in the Philippines
Install Google GBox to Huawei smartphones
Pag-IBIG MP2 online application
How to check PhilHealth contributions online
How to find your SIM card serial number
Globe, PLDT, Converge, Sky: Unli fiber internet plans compared
10 biggest games in the Google Play Store
LTO periodic medical exam for 10-year licenses
Netflix codes to unlock hidden TV shows, movies
Apple, Asus, Cherry Mobile, Huawei, LG, Nokia, Oppo, Samsung, Sony, Vivo, Xiaomi, Lenovo, Infinix Mobile, Pocophone, Honor, iPhone, OnePlus, Tecno, Realme, HTC, Gionee, Kata, IQ00, Redmi, Razer, CloudFone, Motorola, Panasonic, TCL, Wiko
Best Android smartphones between PHP 20,000 - 25,000
Smartphones under PHP 10,000 in the Philippines
Smartphones under PHP 12K Philippines
Best smartphones for kids under PHP 7,000
Smartphones under PHP 15,000 in the Philippines
Best Android smartphones between PHP 15,000 - 20,000
Smartphones under PHP 20,000 in the Philippines
Most affordable 5G phones in the Philippines under PHP 20K
5G smartphones in the Philippines under PHP 16K
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2024
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2023
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2022
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2021
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2020
andre says:
they deserve getting banned. wala namang kwenta yun ginawa nila na kesyo “ipinaglalaban” nila ngayon :P buti sana if there was any technical merit to what they did
Jeffrey says:
Gizmodo responded arrogantly like they don’t depend on the involved companies’ money.
Advertisements may pull out of Giz. Of course, Giz would still be arrogantly childish.
Bianca says:
Agree with Hamilton. What Gizmodo did was very childish and disrespectful to the presenters at CES. On the lighter side, I like what Fake Steve Jobs had to say about the whole thing.
http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/01/dear-gizmodo-dont-even-think-about.html
Arnel says:
Giz should have respected the event….. yun lang masasabi ko…….
boddah says:
Yes, there are a few stunts that are funny the first time but the Motorola presentation i think is over the line. Lam did apologize for that one anyway.
Electronicslabdotph says:
ayos yan hehehe
Hamilton Chua says:
Nice commentary.
Brian Lam is trying to change the subject. The thing is, they did something stupid, childish and annoying, no amount of justification will change that.
Banning the offender for life maybe a bit too harsh but they deserve a “slap on the wrist”.
Abe Olandres says:
No Visa.
I Wish says:
Yuga…Is there any reason you were not at the CES at Las Vegas?
rod says:
yeah i like the video too, the one with sugar plum fairy music background