The Department of Transportation (DOTr) has not swayed on the idea of building an aerial cable car system in hopes to ease congestion on the roads.
During his speech at the Asia CEO Forum, Transportation secretary Arthur Tugade mentioned that this plan is currently in the works as they try to pursue potential investors. “We are finalizing certain details. Hopefully, I would be able to convince proponents,” he said.
Cities planned for the study of the aerial system are the Pasig River, Boracay, and Baguio. Tugade also mentioned that once finalized, he would want the fares to be equal to other forms of public transportation such as jeepneys and buses. “I don’t want a rate that is high so that, you know, the public can benefit,” Tugade mentioned.
This is not the first time the department has looked into flying gondolas as an alternative mode of public transportation. In 2016, Tugade openly expressed his interest in doing feasibility studies for the system, citing that we can learn from our experiences from Bolivia. “‘Yung cable cars pinag-aaralan definitely… Ito ho, hinihiram ko ‘yung Bolivia experience kung saan mayroong mga cable car.” (We’re definitely studying cable cars… I’m looking at the Bolivia experience where there are cable cars.) “Uumpishan mo muna ‘yan sa area ng Pasig, then EDSA, ito ‘yung mga gondola na may 35-passenger capacity,” (We’ll start first in the Pasig area then EDSA, and these gondolas will have a 35-passenger capacity.) he added.
Tugade is referring to Mi Teleférico, a six-line, 20-station cable car urban transit system that has launched in Bolivia in 2014. Deemed as the longest aerial cable car system in the world, it currently serves 80,000 to 90,000 passengers per day with current plans for expansion to address demand. Other cable car systems in the world include the Mexicable in Mexico, the Roosevelt Island Tramway in New York and Portland Aerial Tram in Oregon, USA.
Zipline na lang along EDSA. Mabilis na, nasarapan ka pa sa byahe. Hehe!
cable car system = slow, small number of passengers, high cost.
DOTr, just improve rapid bus transport system. gradually eliminate PUJ and transition PUJ drivers to become Bus drivers…
that’s why there has to be a study that can back the proposal.
News item a coupl’a days ago reported that Tugade’s averse to the BRT because it’ll cause more congestion. His reasoning: the BRT will take away one lane of an already-congested EDSA.
My own feeling is that the BRT will actually reduce congestion — although possibly in the long term pa, not short term — because more people will be inclined to leave their cars and take the BRT. Gotta study how the Curitiba (Brazil) and Bogotá (Columbia) traffic was pre- and post-BRT