President Rodrigo Duterte calls out Facebook for the alleged censorship of advocacy pages supportive of the government.
The President of the Philippines expressed its dismay on his weekly televised address over the accounts taken down by Facebook which found links to the Philippine military and Philippine police. He also sought a meeting with Facebook after questioning its presence in the country.
“If you cannot help me protect the government’s interests, then let us talk. If you are promoting the cause of the rebellion, which was already here before you came, and thousands of my soldiers and civilians dying, then if you cannot reconcile the idea of what your purpose is or was, then we have to talk,” Duterte stated.
Presidential spokesman Harry Roque shared that stopping Facebook from operating in the Philippines would be highly disadvantageous as Filipinos are part of a huge chunk of the social media networking site’s users with 74 million accounts. Roque added that the pages supportive of the government were banned due to its “inauthentic behavior” and not due to its content.
“We believe in freedom of speech. They may use as justification inauthentic behavior but the effect is censorship because the ideas contained in the pages were erased,” the Palace spokesman said.
For House Speaker Alan Peter Cayetano, he sees the essence of the social networking site to the country’s democracy as it disseminates information to Filipinos and gives them a platform to communicate. However, he finds cites reports that Facebook took down verified accounts to the AFP and PNP while allowing accounts that let citizens directly participate in the overthrow of the Duterte administration.
As posted by Speaker Alan Peter Cayetano on his Facebook page, the House of Representatives is set to probe Facebook over the actions done towards accounts linked to the AFP and PNP after the passage of the 2021 budget of the Congress.
Sources: The Philippine Star, Manila Bulletin, Alan Peter Cayetano Facebook Page
YugaTech.com is the largest and longest-running technology site in the Philippines. Originally established in October 2002, the site was transformed into a full-fledged technology platform in 2005.
How to transfer, withdraw money from PayPal to GCash
Prices of Starlink satellite in the Philippines
Install Google GBox to Huawei smartphones
Pag-IBIG MP2 online application
How to check PhilHealth contributions online
How to find your SIM card serial number
Globe, PLDT, Converge, Sky: Unli fiber internet plans compared
10 biggest games in the Google Play Store
LTO periodic medical exam for 10-year licenses
Netflix codes to unlock hidden TV shows, movies
Apple, Asus, Cherry Mobile, Huawei, LG, Nokia, Oppo, Samsung, Sony, Vivo, Xiaomi, Lenovo, Infinix Mobile, Pocophone, Honor, iPhone, OnePlus, Tecno, Realme, HTC, Gionee, Kata, IQ00, Redmi, Razer, CloudFone, Motorola, Panasonic, TCL, Wiko
Best Android smartphones between PHP 20,000 - 25,000
Smartphones under PHP 10,000 in the Philippines
Smartphones under PHP 12K Philippines
Best smartphones for kids under PHP 7,000
Smartphones under PHP 15,000 in the Philippines
Best Android smartphones between PHP 15,000 - 20,000
Smartphones under PHP 20,000 in the Philippines
Most affordable 5G phones in the Philippines under PHP 20K
5G smartphones in the Philippines under PHP 16K
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2024
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2023
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2022
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2021
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2020
Mel says:
Typical pinoy politicians. What is there to investigate? Facebook is a private business/online service and as such it is their prerogative to decide on what can and can’t be posted on their service.
Don’t like their rules? Tough luck, but nobody’s forcing anyone to use FB and those DDS/Chinese trolls can use other social media websites like VK or even create their own fake news social media website.
Dehins Uy says:
FB is a private entity. Freedom of speech is there so that the government or agents of the state are not allowed to directly or indirectly stifle that freedom. It does not apply to something like FB because it is not the government.
Also, it is not about the advocacy and it does not matter. The issue is about the inauthentic behavior including the use of fake accounts.