The introduction of the AMD Fusion APU has sparked a lot of curiosity among consumers who only had Intel’s Atom and ULVs as lone choices for netbooks and ultraportables for a long time. Among AMD’s new CPU line-up is the dual-core E-350 running at 1.6GHz.
AMD’s Fusion APU can be considered a direct competitor to Intel’s HD Graphics embedded chip, specifically the one on the Core i3. It can also be compared to the older Intel Core 2 Duo ULV processors with Intel GMA 4500 chips or the newer set of dual-core Atom processors coupled with NVidia Ion2 chip.
So what we have here below is a line-up of ultraportables running various Intel and AMD chips with their Windows Experience Index taken during review.
Intel Core i3 330UM ULV @ 1.2GHz with Intel HD Graphics
(Asus UL20FT)
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 @ 1.3GHz with Intel GMA 4500MHD
(Asus UL20A)
Intel Atom D525 Dual Core @ 1.8GHz with NVidia Ion2
(Asus Eee PC 1215N)
AMD Athlon II Neo K125 @ 1.7GHz with ATI Radeon HD 4225
(Acer Aspire One 721)
AMD Athlon II Neo K325 @ 1.3GHz with ATI Radeon HD 4225
(Acer Aspire 1551)
AMD E-350 @ 1.6GHz with AMD Radeon HD6310
(Sony Vaio Y)
In terms of processor, the AMD E-350 is just below the old Intel ULVs by a couple of points and much lower than a ULV Core i3. However, it beats the Intel Atom D525 Dual Core @ 1.8GHz processor by a significant difference.
It’s actually in the graphics department where the E-350 with its Radeon HD6310 trumps everybody else — Intel GMA 4500MHD, Intel HD Graphics and even beating the NVidia Ion2 as well.
Here’s a chart of WEI sub-scores of all netbook/ultraportable CPUs we’ve tested before.
The AMD E-350 chip has a TDP of 18watts which is exactly the same the Intel Core i3-330UM so it terms of battery life, they’re pretty much at par with each other. This comparison is only based on WEI and is in-conclusive but that should give us a good birds eye view of where AMD’s Fusion APU is positioned.
YugaTech.com is the largest and longest-running technology site in the Philippines. Originally established in October 2002, the site was transformed into a full-fledged technology platform in 2005.
How to transfer, withdraw money from PayPal to GCash
Prices of Starlink satellite in the Philippines
Install Google GBox to Huawei smartphones
Pag-IBIG MP2 online application
How to check PhilHealth contributions online
How to find your SIM card serial number
Globe, PLDT, Converge, Sky: Unli fiber internet plans compared
10 biggest games in the Google Play Store
LTO periodic medical exam for 10-year licenses
Netflix codes to unlock hidden TV shows, movies
Apple, Asus, Cherry Mobile, Huawei, LG, Nokia, Oppo, Samsung, Sony, Vivo, Xiaomi, Lenovo, Infinix Mobile, Pocophone, Honor, iPhone, OnePlus, Tecno, Realme, HTC, Gionee, Kata, IQ00, Redmi, Razer, CloudFone, Motorola, Panasonic, TCL, Wiko
Best Android smartphones between PHP 20,000 - 25,000
Smartphones under PHP 10,000 in the Philippines
Smartphones under PHP 12K Philippines
Best smartphones for kids under PHP 7,000
Smartphones under PHP 15,000 in the Philippines
Best Android smartphones between PHP 15,000 - 20,000
Smartphones under PHP 20,000 in the Philippines
Most affordable 5G phones in the Philippines under PHP 20K
5G smartphones in the Philippines under PHP 16K
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2024
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2023
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2022
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2021
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2020
tipler says:
This article is just all over the place.
Jhay says:
The Windows Experience Index is enough for the average consumer as only hardcore geeks pay attention and obsess with other more detailed benchmark tests for CPUs.
Another major factor: the price! :D
radioactive_balut says:
Comparison way way WEI trivial.
Kyle says:
Hi Yuga,
I think there’s an error in your article. I noticed that you compared the difference of the 4 processors based on “graphics component”. While the two (Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 and AMD e-350) are on “Gaming Graphics” and “Processor” division
otepsphere says:
Nice info! anyways, between the two what will you choose?! …
ocean says:
hi yuga, i’ve read in the APU whitepaper that the fusion architecture lessens the power needed as compared to conventional chipsets (shorter distance traveled, less electrons needed).
Wendal says:
I have an SU7300 (Thinkpad Edge) and an E-350 (dm1z) and am torn about which one to use for daily surfing. I like the speed of the CPU on the Edge but the portability of the dm1.. still “testing” both before I give one to my girlfriend.
Ric says:
Do this test again and include a Sandy Brigde solution. That should put this argument to rest.
Les says:
I’ve been a long fan of Intel chips but this AMD Fusion chip is impressive for Netbooks and i wish every brand should have it. It’s a new battle for Tablets vs. Netbooks.
As for the Sand Bridge Chips just read this review:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-20030070-64.html
Les says:
I’ve been a long fan of Intel chips but this AMD Fusion chip is impressive for Netbooks and i wish every brand should have it. It’s a new battle for Tablets vs. Netbooks.
As for the Sandy Bridge Chips just read this review:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-20030070-64.html