A lot of bloggers are afraid to have their content syndicated because of several reasons – dupe content penalty, brand dilution resulting to reduced site stickiness, and ultimately potential loss of traffic, among others. Connie even stretches it as a form of exploitation in some cases. However, that’s not always the case and here are some thoughts when content syndication can be beneficial to you as a blogger.
First, lay down the terms of the syndication. What’s in it for you — link and referral traffic? That’s it? Maybe there’s more to that than meets the eye. Here are some of the things you’ll need to consider when agreeing to content syndication.
Okay, let’s answer some areas of concern.
There are two main points I’m trying to pin down here.
Discoverability. You stand to get new visitors/readers you won’t otherwise attract if you did not enter into this syndication. We did a really simple syndication agreement with Globe two months ago. Now I realized that the few hundred visitors coming in to the blog from their 3G Portal is a segment I would not have reached if it weren’t for that agreement. And I couldn’t count how many readers and bloggers tell me “hey, found your blog on myGlobe!”.
SEO. This is one factor that could have been overlooked. If the entity syndicating your content has a bigger profile (like a media company or a portal), you stand to benefit from the massive link love. Think old highly trusted domain with permanent anchored text links. Aside from the foot traffic, those links will not only benefit the blog that had the original content but other blogs/sites you might have mentioned and linked in your syndicated content. That’s hard to put a price on that one (unless you regularly buy links from TLA).
Even if it’s a new site, think about where the syndication partner will bring it in the next couple of months or years. Last time I met the people behind GMANews.tv, they told me they’re pulling somewhere around 14 million pageviews/month for their newly launched portal. That’s just the first 6 months.
Next time you get a syndication offer, think about it real hard. There are short-term benefits and long-term ones. You might think you’re getting the shorter end of the stick in the beginning but wait a year or two when the real benefits come in.
YugaTech.com is the largest and longest-running technology site in the Philippines. Originally established in October 2002, the site was transformed into a full-fledged technology platform in 2005.
How to transfer, withdraw money from PayPal to GCash
Prices of Starlink satellite in the Philippines
Install Google GBox to Huawei smartphones
Pag-IBIG MP2 online application
How to check PhilHealth contributions online
How to find your SIM card serial number
Globe, PLDT, Converge, Sky: Unli fiber internet plans compared
10 biggest games in the Google Play Store
LTO periodic medical exam for 10-year licenses
Netflix codes to unlock hidden TV shows, movies
Apple, Asus, Cherry Mobile, Huawei, LG, Nokia, Oppo, Samsung, Sony, Vivo, Xiaomi, Lenovo, Infinix Mobile, Pocophone, Honor, iPhone, OnePlus, Tecno, Realme, HTC, Gionee, Kata, IQ00, Redmi, Razer, CloudFone, Motorola, Panasonic, TCL, Wiko
Best Android smartphones between PHP 20,000 - 25,000
Smartphones under PHP 10,000 in the Philippines
Smartphones under PHP 12K Philippines
Best smartphones for kids under PHP 7,000
Smartphones under PHP 15,000 in the Philippines
Best Android smartphones between PHP 15,000 - 20,000
Smartphones under PHP 20,000 in the Philippines
Most affordable 5G phones in the Philippines under PHP 20K
5G smartphones in the Philippines under PHP 16K
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2024
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2023
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2022
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2021
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2020
Connie says:
You missed the point. There is more to life than utilitarian considerations. And when a blogger projects an eager beaver front, he’ll never get respect. He might fool the gullible (admittedly, there are far too many out there) but the thinking crowd will always laugh at him.
Abe Olandres says:
I’m approaching the arrangement in general (not just your specific case). Likewise, you may take my perspective as a businessman rather than a blogger (trading content now for potential future traffic -> revenues).
I think I get your point. Yes, I agree with you from the point of independent and well-established blogger — some things just cannot be casually traded.
But to others, it could be a good opportunity to get exposure and more. At the end, I stand that it’s a case to case basis.
Dave Starr --- ROI Guy says:
Some good thughts offerred up. But I am mystified by your explanation in the Duplicate Content Penalty paragraph … a seemung riddle which I still don’t see the answer to. It is logical and indeed would be the most fair solution for Google to give full credit to the original publisher and then less and less to those places where the content is published later. However, how will Google know3 which site published the content “first”?
Individuals run their servers in all combintions of the 24 major world time zones … are you suggesting that when crawling a site Google will convert the time stamp to WTC and then determine the order of publication based on a standardized time?
Determining “who published first” may well be more difficult that one thinks, me thinks.
Abe Olandres says:
Dave, I think the problem of which content is original is not about the timestamp but which content is linking to. The link attribution will tell Google which duplicate is the original.
Dave Starr --- ROI Guy says:
OK, if I understand your take correctly, Abe, it is all about the links. So if I post an article on one bog and post the same article on another blog … with no links …. Google does not see this as duplicate content?
If this si so, then alot of people worrying about the duplicate content penalty don’t really have anyhting to fear … because typically ‘scrapers” and other unauthorized syndicators do not link to the content they are duplicating. So if it isn’t linked, it isn’t duplicated?
Interesting.
Connie says:
The “long term benefits” approach works in many ways. You can get the much needed break by saying yes even with gritted teeth but you can also be setting an image that may be hard to shake off when you’re not so needy for exposure anymore. So, mahirap din basta na lang kumagat. Mga tao pa naman sa corporate media, they can smell suckers from 10 miles away.