Got a bit intrigued with this article on The Argus UK about a university lecturer bannng students from using Google and Wikipedia, adding that many students don’t use their own brains enough in doing research and analysis.
It has been debated for quite some time that the use of Wikipedia by university students should be discouraged. In recent years, more and more students are relying on the internet for their term papers and doing research. The library has now been ditched in favor of the world wide web.
Prof Brabazon said: “The education world has pursued new technology with an almost evangelical zeal and it is time to take a step back and give proper consideration of how we use it. Too many students don’t use their own brains enough. We need to bring back the important values of research and analysis.” She calls this phenomenon The University of Google.
She said thousands of students across the country, including those at the universities of Brighton and Sussex, were churning out banal and mediocre work by using what search engines provided them.
During my college years, when the internet was sting young and not a lot of information was available online, most of the research that I do came from stacks of books, CD encyclopedias and microfiches. It was tedious, very time consuming, expensive (tons of print-outs) and sometimes the statistical data I gather are outdated.
Back then, I didn’t know Google. I was using Alta Vista and Yahoo most of the time while Wikipedia was not yet born.
“I ban my students from using Google, Wikipedia and other websites like that. I give them a reading list to work from and expect them to cite a good number of them in any work they produce.”
She said young people were finishing education with shallow ideas and needed to learn interpretative skills before starting to use technology.
Compare that to today’s vast resources on the internet. Student programmers can always sneak into Google Code Search and copy a snippet of code, chem students can read up on how to mix nitric and sulfuric acids and end up cooking trinitroglycerin, or totally copy and paste and entire Wikipedia entry on Magellan’s discovery of the Philippines islands.
Of course, not everyone will do that. But, with the right amount of academic pressure, sometimes these kids will do just about anything just to get a passing mark. Most will go the path of least resistance.
Still, I think it’s all up to the students. To those who’ve just graduated recently or are still studying, is the internet a necessary tool in your research?
YugaTech.com is the largest and longest-running technology site in the Philippines. Originally established in October 2002, the site was transformed into a full-fledged technology platform in 2005.
How to transfer, withdraw money from PayPal to GCash
Prices of Starlink satellite in the Philippines
Install Google GBox to Huawei smartphones
Pag-IBIG MP2 online application
How to check PhilHealth contributions online
How to find your SIM card serial number
Globe, PLDT, Converge, Sky: Unli fiber internet plans compared
10 biggest games in the Google Play Store
LTO periodic medical exam for 10-year licenses
Netflix codes to unlock hidden TV shows, movies
Apple, Asus, Cherry Mobile, Huawei, LG, Nokia, Oppo, Samsung, Sony, Vivo, Xiaomi, Lenovo, Infinix Mobile, Pocophone, Honor, iPhone, OnePlus, Tecno, Realme, HTC, Gionee, Kata, IQ00, Redmi, Razer, CloudFone, Motorola, Panasonic, TCL, Wiko
Best Android smartphones between PHP 20,000 - 25,000
Smartphones under PHP 10,000 in the Philippines
Smartphones under PHP 12K Philippines
Best smartphones for kids under PHP 7,000
Smartphones under PHP 15,000 in the Philippines
Best Android smartphones between PHP 15,000 - 20,000
Smartphones under PHP 20,000 in the Philippines
Most affordable 5G phones in the Philippines under PHP 20K
5G smartphones in the Philippines under PHP 16K
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2024
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2023
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2022
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2021
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2020
A scientist in the kitchen says:
There is no doubt that the internet is very useful in research. In my case, it gives me access to journal articles, contacts with other researchers, access to softwares for analyses, and keep me up to date with the latest in my field. I guess it’s really up to the students if they will fall into the trap of relying too much on the internet for their assignments.
Jamie says:
I think there should be a balance.
Wikipedia though is a no-no for me when it comes to research papers.
titopao says:
First, a disclaimer: I’m quite active at the Wikipedia, so I may have a bias here. But I’ll do my best to avoid that :)
Second: the problem, as I see it, is that for some students, research has merely become a cut-and-paste thing. When I was studying in high school way, way before people even heard of Yahoo (and way back when Google was still just a post-grad project at Standford U.), the most hi-tech research tool we had in our library was a couple of computer terminals with the online edition of Grolier’s Encyclopedia running on it. Students were notorious for copying and pasting the articles without even citing where they got it, and submitted the hodge-podge article as their own “research paper”. So it wasn’t quite a surprise when, in college, I still found some students doing the same thing—this time, with the Internet (and that was even before Wikipedia became online).
The reliability of Wikipedia (and, one may argue, of encyclopedias in general) is still debatable, but for me the more pressing issue is how students do their research. Are students these days as scrutinizing as we believe they should when they are working on their research papers? Are they giving enough effort to provide their own inputs (if not formulate new ideas) based on their own research materials?
jhay says:
I use Wikipedia and Google a lot. I hardly visit our library nowadays, but do I have any choice? Our library does not have the books that I need for my research.
Electronicslabdotph says:
ang maganda sa wikipedia eh free cya unlike some other online libraries na may subscription fee.
noemi says:
I remember my daughter had to submit a bibliography of books for any research paper. In certain occasions, there are not many books on topics such as blogs, blogging so that’s when the internet is needed. Other than that, I believe books should be a more reliable research material.
emmanuel martinez says:
Yup. I owned a little internet shop last last year and I see the students just copy and paste the articles found in wiki and google with no effort at all!
Joseph says:
Can’t researchers try to find the primary source of a Wikipedia article by looking at the footnotes?
Something Fishy says:
I think Wikipedia is bad for kids too. many of the famous porn stars have their biography on WIKIPEDIA. BAD for the kids. Look for Crystal Klein, shes in WIKIPEDIA.
Shutter Box Philippines says:
Both google and wikipedia are important tools when doing research regardless whether you are a student or not.
As with all research work done using online references… not everything you read is factual so don’t rely on a single source… you should do your homework by checking that the info posted have been verified or came from a legit and reliable source and try to cross reference it with other reputable sites.