Sen. Recto calls for 10 Mbps minimum Internet speed

Oks lang yan pare, hayaan natin silang magpabango at magfile ng mga bill na pabor sa taumbayan. Di rin naman malalaman ni Mr. E-VAT Recto at ibang politicians kung iboboto natin sila o hindi di ba :)

Lol

pero mas concerned ako dun sa 3-5GB per month. 10Mbps nga net natin, pero for 1-2 days lang, the rest of the month? 2G speeds! Hahaha

Same here. Dun nga sa CAP na nireklamo ni Angara (tama ba?) may nangyari ba?!?

^ this.

mga namihasa kasi sa unlimited tong mga to.. well di rin natin sila masisisi..

Well said. Dapat kasi alamin rin muna ng lawmakers pano ba gumagana ang internet. Hindi puro kuda.

Hindi lang naman ang mga downloaders ang makikinabang doon. Mga graphic artist na gumagamit ng adobe cloud, mga architect na kailangang magpadala ng 3d render designs sa ibang bansa thru email. Marami ang makikinabang nito sa industry dahil di na sila maoobliga na kumuha ng dsl corporate account na napakamahal.

cguro taga globe o smart ka.. kaw lng ata tumutotol ah.. umayus ka ha ser a.. need nmin ang mlakas n net lalo na sa shop ku. kung ikaw d mu need manahimik ka n lng.. no offnce thnjk you

10Meg is not overkill when you have a large family and one uses Skype while another watches public videos on youtube leaving the last person with not enough speed to play a simple online game.

Those 3 tasks alone can being a 10Meg home network to its knees. Doing that on less. You may as well have all family members wait in line for 1 pc… thus removing the “basic right” form internet and once again keeping it in the optional resource category… It is a good idea to keep up with neighboring countries… we were once on top… let us do what we can to get back closer to the top.. and not fall behind DECADES in a technology that can be managed just as lawmakers are trying to do now.

bobo kang jakerson ka

hindi naman nagkaroon ng hackers para lang magmodify ng cannopy or mag tweaks ng bandwidth speed nila. kung kilala mo ang anonymous ay maiintindihan mo ako. medyo irrelevant ng konti ang hackers na tinutukoy mo.

as if drafting law is just some idea thrown in black and white and proposed to senate.

of course they have research body to do it, duh!

it wouldn’t even be considered an “act” if senate does not find it interesting.

I was expecting squatter comments na magsasabing “Eh di pumunta ka ng America”. The trauma of reading Pinoy comments haha.

eh di pumunta ka ng amerika

That is abuse-driven thinking. Majority of need for internet as “basic service” doesn’t include high bandwidth allocation. There is a reason bakit may capping, to prevent abuse. On the other hand, if you increase speed you also increase reliability in general, since most people use internet fo mail, social networking, surfing. Why the hell would those require beyond 3gig allocation? As long as these needs are addressed, that bill becomes a real-life benefit. Hirap senyong mga hoggers ng internet puro media consumption nasa isip.

@jandy at paano naman yung mga ofw’s na contstant ang communications sa pamilya nila dito sa pamilya(i.e. skype) are they tied to a limited no. of minutes na sinasabi nung cap, inspite di lang namn yun ang magiging gamit nung line nila within a month.. nbrainwash ka na ba sa mga explanations ng mga telcos… think…think..think…. are those heavy users… per se…. only are those downloading torrents…..

@Jandy hindi naman lahat ng nagsusubscribe sa mobile data eh on-the-go internet lang ang purpose.meron iba na for home use talaga kasi wala namang dsl o fiber na available sa area nila. tska diba panloloko ginawa ng mga telco?inadvertise nila as UNLIMITED tapos bigla nilang lalagyan ng capping?!ngayon, kung inadvertise pa nila un na may capping, ok lang.actually, wala naman problema sakin angmay capping, para nga naman hindi maabuso ng mga nagtotorrent lang.pero masyado kasing mababa ung 3gig per month, kahit 10 mins/day na youtube, ubos na, moderate usage lang un ah.tas fb pa,etc. sana magawa man lang ng telcos na maging unlimited pero moderate usage.

telcos are privately owned